Weezlyvs
Reply.ioOne price instead of a stackReply.io adds channels.
Weezly adds meetings.
Respect where due: Reply.io is a serious multichannel suite, and Weezly even integrates with it. But its LinkedIn is a +$69 add-on running in a Chrome-extension sidecar, its video is a thumbnail link, and a converting rep lands near $187 a month before Jason AI. Weezly is the $59 LinkedIn conversion layer: your clone's video in the DM, replies read by AI, meetings booked.
A converting rep at Reply.iothe stackFigures from their published pricing, July 2026, annual billing (check their pricing, it changes).
A converting rep at Weezlyone lineThe whole machine below is in it.
No LinkedIn add-on, no data add-on, no AI add-on. The seat is the machine.
And if you love Reply for email, keep it: Reply.io is a Weezly integration.
Same rep, same job. One platform prices it as add-ons, the other as the product.
A genuinely wide platform. LinkedIn is the thin mile.
Credit where due, and there is a lot of it: Reply.io runs email, WhatsApp, SMS and calls in one sequence, its cold email engine is mature, and Jason AI is a real autonomous SDR. We like it enough to integrate with it. The catch sits on the one channel this page is about.
Multichannel seat ~$89/mo annual; LinkedIn +$69, calls/SMS +$29, Live Data +$39, Jason AI from ~$500/mo. Their published pricing, July 2026 (check their pricing, it changes).
"Supercharge your sales team with AI." It is a fair pitch, for email.
Tasks · 11 Keep this tab open
Not advertised on their site, pricing or help docs, July 2026.
The LinkedIn conversion layer, nothing bolted on.
Six parts, one $59 subscription, all illustrated below with live coded scenes and real app screenshots. Everything Reply.io prices as an add-on, plus the conversion machine no add-on buys.
One priceYour cloneCloud sendersMobile app300M+ leadsSequence steps their add-on menu does not list.
The real builder below, exactly as it looks in the app. Reply's LinkedIn actions cover requests, messages, voice notes, views, likes and InMails. Weezly's canvas adds the steps that turn a sequence into a conversation.
Fair is fair: Reply's LinkedIn actions include voice and AI voice messages, per their published docs, July 2026. The other five are not on their action list.
No sidecar, no open tab. The cloud does the sending.
Reply's LinkedIn steps execute in a Chrome extension pinned to a browser that has to stay open. Weezly's senders live in the cloud, and the video they deliver is a file in the thread, not a link out of it.
With Reply.iothe sidecar
Hi Ana, made this for you 👇
Thumbnail · opens a new tabLinkedIn tasks11 queuedWith Weezlythe cloudHi Ana, made this for you 👇
Sent with Weezly Your clone · made for AnaLaptop closed.
🔥 Positive reply from AnanowLeft: extension architecture per their docs and third-party reviews, July 2026. Right: a real Weezly render playing in a coded scene.
A render farm for your face.
Reply personalizes text and hands video to Vidyard or Hippo links. Weezly clones you once, then renders a unique video per lead in 25 languages and uploads the file.
One take in. A file per lead out.
Weezly clones your face and voice from a single two-minute recording, then runs a render farm for your campaigns: a unique video per lead, in 25 languages, delivered as an actual mp4 your cloud sender uploads into the DM. Not a link for Vidyard to host somewhere else.
Three leads, three different videos, one recording. With Reply.io, all three would get the same Vidyard link.
We ran the same two-minute take through Sendspark, Hippo Video and Sendr, side by side with Weezly. It was not close.
Reply.io does not advertise a clone engine, so there was nothing to race. The clone videos playing on this page are unedited Weezly renders. Judge them yourself.
Their database is bigger. Ours is included.
Reply Data claims 1B+ contacts and we will not pretend otherwise. Weezly's 300M+ ships inside the subscription, verifies every email at search time, and pushes straight into a campaign. Below: the actual product.
Reply Data claims 1B+. Bigger number, credit to them.Reply Data1B+ contacts claimed across 150+ countries, a genuinely big set. Fresh data and 2x verified emails are paid add-ons on a credit meter, and per their published docs, July 2026, no bounce-rate benchmarks or verification methodology are published.
Weezly database300M+ contacts, a smaller headline and we say so. But it is inside the $59, every email is verified at the moment you search, and the result pushes straight into a campaign. No credit meter, no $39 add-on.
Replies become a pipeline. Senders live in your pocket.
Reply classifies reply intent and syncs statuses to your CRM. Weezly keeps the whole loop: AI reads every reply, fills a kanban from Interested to Won, and the mobile app pings you the moment one sounds like a meeting.
Reply.io: statuses sync out to your CRM, per their docs
Reviewers report no native Reply.io mobile app as of July 2026; not advertised on their site.
Safe sending without babysitting a tab.
SSI-based limits, sender rotation, cloud campaigns. Then the honest channels row, because Reply runs email, WhatsApp, SMS and calls today and this page says so.
Their channels are wider. Our LinkedIn mile runs deeper.
Reply.io spans email, WhatsApp, SMS and calls today, and we print that in the table below. On the channel this page is about, Weezly sends from the cloud on SSI-based limits, rotates senders inside one campaign, and never asks you to babysit a browser tab. Honestly hedged: every LinkedIn automation, ours included, runs outside LinkedIn's terms.
Recommended: 34 invites/day
Read per account, applied in one click. Not advertised at Reply.
Sending as Nils P.
From the cloud, all night, laptop shut
Email-led? Keep Reply. It is a Weezly integration for a reason.
HeyReach
Expandi
La Growth Machine
lemlist
Dripify
WaalaxyAll inside Weezly OutreachTheir seat starts the bill. Our $59 ends it.
Reply.iotheir published pricing, July 2026Annual billing, email only despite the name. Check their pricing, it changes.
Weezly No add-onsLess than a third of their converting-rep stack, with the whole platform in it.
"LinkedIn blocked my account after two weeks. The Chrome extension is clearly detectable."
"Almost entirely about auto-renewal confusion, unclear minimum contract terms, and refund difficulties."
"24 to 72 hour response times for support issues."
Public reviews, July 2026, kept in proportion: Reply.io holds about 4.6/5 on G2 from 1,500+ reviews, and the complaints cluster on billing and LinkedIn safety, not on the email engine. The structural point stands either way: the LinkedIn mile is an add-on there and the product here.
The fair fight, ties included.
Reply.io wins real rows here: multichannel width today, the mature email engine, the bigger database headline, Jason AI. We print those as ties and concessions, then look at what each subscription buys on LinkedIn.
| Capability | Weezly | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Multichannel sequences (email, WhatsApp, SMS, calls)Fair fight | LinkedIn today; email, WhatsApp and Instagram on the roadmap | Email, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, SMS and calls today |
| Cold email engine (warmup, deliverability, multi-mailbox)Fair fight | On the roadmap, keep Reply for this | Mature: warmup, anti-spam suite, 10 mailboxes per seat |
| Built-in B2B databaseFair fight | 300M+ included, emails verified at search time | Reply Data, 1B+ contacts claimed, credits plus paid add-ons |
| Meeting scheduler includedFair fight | Booking pages under every video, Google and Outlook calendars | Reply Calendar, tied to Google Calendar |
| Voice messages on LinkedInFair fight | ||
| AI on the outboundFair fight | AI reads replies, writes post comments, generates clone videos, included | Jason AI, an autonomous AI SDR, separate product from ~$500/mo |
| Native CRM integrationsFair fight | HubSpot, plus webhooks and REST API | Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close |
| Real video file uploaded natively in the LinkedIn DM | Generated per lead from your clone | A Vidyard or Hippo Video thumbnail link to an external page |
| AI face and voice cloning, 25 languages | One 2-minute recording, ever | Not advertised |
| LinkedIn sending architecture | Cloud senders, runs with your laptop closed | Chrome extension, the browser has to stay open |
| SSI-based safe sending limits | Read per account, applied in one click | Not advertised |
| Deal pipeline on replies | Kanban from Interested to Won, built in | Reply statuses; the pipeline lives in your external CRM |
| Mobile app with AI reply alerts (iOS + Android) | Not advertised | |
| Price for a rep running LinkedIn outreach | $59/mo per sender, everything above included | ~$187/mo: seat plus LinkedIn and calls add-ons (their published pricing, July 2026) |
Reply.io capabilities and prices from their published site, pricing and help docs, July 2026 (their site blocks robots, so verify on the live pages). "Not advertised" means exactly that: we could not find it on their public pages. And yes, they are a Weezly integration partner; this table is about choosing your LinkedIn layer, not about burning a bridge.
Weezly vs Reply.io, answered
Keep Reply for the email. Add Weezly for the meetings.
Reply.io runs a wide outbound suite, and the two tools even integrate. Weezly runs the mile Reply leaves to add-ons: your AI clone's video natively in the LinkedIn DM, cloud sending, AI-read replies, a pipeline and booking pages, one $59 subscription instead of a stack. Setting it up takes an afternoon.