LGMMutual partners. Different jobs.La Growth Machine runs the layer.
Weezly runs the last mile.
Full respect first: LGM is a genuinely strong multichannel engine, LinkedIn, email and X in one flow, AI voice on every plan, and the two products even list each other as integrations. But its video is a link out of the thread, and its enriched leads are metered by the month. Weezly is the $59 conversion layer: your clone's video as a real file in the DM, replies read by AI, meetings booked.
Basic €60, Ultimate up to ~€180.
Real credit given: voice AI, X and absorbed proxies are genuinely theirs. Figures from their published pricing, July 2026 (check their pricing, it changes).
The whole machine below is in it.
Emails verified at search time, inside the $59. No monthly quota, no credit packs.
And if you love LGM's layer, keep it: the two products integrate, in both directions.
Same billing model, per sending identity. The question is what lives inside the box.
A genuinely great layer. The thread stays text.
Credit where due, and there is a lot of it: LGM sequences LinkedIn, email and X from one builder, puts AI voice in the DM on every plan, and its Signals engine finds the next audience on its own. Their homepage says "keep the tools you love, plug them into LGM." We agree so much that both products list each other as integrations. The catch sits on the last mile.
Basic ~€60, Pro ~€120, Ultimate up to ~€180 per identity per month; enriched leads 250 / 400 / 1,000 by plan. Their published pricing, July 2026 (check their pricing, it changes).

"Your GTM stack. Our engine built to convert." Ours is built to book.
Not advertised on their site, pricing or changelog, July 2026. LGM Database exists and is credited above; the wedge is the monthly meter, not existence.
The last mile, built as the product.
Six parts, one $59 subscription, all illustrated below with live coded scenes and real app screenshots. Everything the layer hands to links and meters, running as one machine.
One priceYour cloneNo lead meterMobile app300M+ leadsSequence steps their menu does not list.
The real builder below, exactly as it looks in the app. LGM's LinkedIn actions cover invites, DMs, voice messages, visits and likes, and the voice step is genuinely theirs too. Weezly's canvas adds the steps that put a face in the thread and a meeting on the calendar.

Fair is fair: AI voice messages on LinkedIn ship on every LGM plan and they were early to it. The other five steps are not on their published action list, July 2026.
The layer warms the lead. The last mile turns the thread.
One continuous LinkedIn conversation. Email, X and voice run in the gutter, exactly the relay LGM is great at. Watch where the reply actually happens.
The relay · one campaignThe layer did its job on every stop. The conversation turned on the one step the layer cannot carry.
Gustav, recorded this for you 👇
One continuous thread, coded scene, real Weezly render playing. The relay steps on the left are the layer doing exactly what LGM is good at. The turn is the last mile.
A render farm for your face.
LGM personalizes text and voice, and hands video to its integrations as links. Weezly clones you once, then renders a unique video per lead in 25 languages and uploads the file.
Your voice is in their DMs. Your face is not.
LGM's AI voice messages are real and we tie-badge them all over this page. But video on LGM means Sendspark, Hyperise or Weezly generating links into a custom attribute. Weezly clones your face and voice from one two-minute recording, renders a unique video per lead in 25 languages, and uploads the actual mp4 into the DM.
Three leads, three languages, one recording. On LGM, all three steps would carry the same {{video_url}} attribute pointing off LinkedIn.
We ran the same two-minute take through Sendspark, Hippo Video and Sendr, side by side with Weezly. It was not close.
La Growth Machine does not advertise a clone engine, so there was nothing to race. The clone videos playing on this page are unedited Weezly renders. Judge them yourself.
Their database is metered. Ours is included.
LGM Database is real and its waterfall enrichment is clever, and this page says so. The difference is the monthly cap: 250 to 1,000 enriched leads by plan. Weezly's 300M+ ships inside the subscription, verified at search time, uncapped. Below: the actual product.

LGM Database + waterfallReal and credited: native ICP company and contact search, plus multi-provider waterfall enrichment run before launch. The catch is the meter: verified enrichment is capped at 250, 400 or 1,000 leads per month by plan, then credits, per their published pricing, July 2026.
300M+ contacts inside the $59, every email verified at the moment you search, results pushed straight into a campaign. No monthly quota, no credit packs, no reset date to watch.
Replies become a pipeline. Signals live in your pocket.
LGM routes replies to its inbox and syncs statuses to your CRM on the top tier. Weezly keeps the whole loop: AI reads every reply, fills a kanban from Interested to Won, and the mobile app feeds you every conversion signal as it happens.

LGM: inbox + statuses; the pipeline lives in your CRM, on the top tierA mobile app is not advertised on LGM's site as of July 2026; a desktop wrapper is listed by third parties.
Safe sending, meetings out the other end.
SSI-based limits, sender rotation, cloud campaigns. Then the honest channels row, because LGM runs email and X today and this page says so.
Their channels run wider. Our LinkedIn mile runs deeper.
LGM sequences email and X today and absorbs proxy costs into every identity, and the table below prints all of that. On the channel this page is about, Weezly sends from the cloud on SSI-based limits, rotates senders inside one campaign, and pings your phone when a reply sounds like a meeting. Honestly hedged: every LinkedIn automation, ours included, runs outside LinkedIn's terms.
Recommended: 34 invites/day
Read per account, applied in one click. LGM's limits simulate behaviour; SSI-based is not advertised there.
Sending as Nils P.
From the cloud, all night, laptop shut
Need email and X this quarter? Keep LGM. It is a Weezly integration for a reason.
HeyReach
Expandi
La Growth Machine
lemlist
Dripify
Waalaxy
Not switching? Good. The two integrate.
This is the rare comparison page that means it: the partnership is mutual, LGM lists Weezly on its own integrations page. If LGM runs your layer, plug Weezly's videos straight into it.
The Weezly Chrome extension plugs into app.lagrowthmachine.com. No API keys, no setup calls.
Open an LGM audience, click the button, record 30 seconds once. A per-lead AI video renders for everyone in it.
Each lead's video link, with a booking page under it, drops into your LinkedIn, email and X steps.
Same model, per sender. Different contents.
Both platforms bill per sending identity, so no add-on-stack tricks here. The comparison is simply what one unit includes, and what happens when you add more.
Basic ~€60, Ultimate up to ~€180. Check their pricing, it changes and tiers moved on our fetch.
Three senders land at $177, with the whole machine in every one of them.
"Buggy with occasional sync errors and UI lags that disrupt workflow setup."
"Per-identity pricing punishes growth. Three identities on Pro land at 360 euros a month."
"Basic features like customizing the messaging journey hidden in highly priced tiers."
Kept in proportion, because the overall picture is good: LGM holds about 4.7/5 on G2 from 100+ reviews and 4.6/5 on Capterra, and it has run LinkedIn automation since 2017. The structural point stands either way: the last mile is a link and a meter there, and the product here.
The fair fight, ties included.
LGM wins real rows here: email with inbox rotation, X as a channel, the Signals engine, the MCP server. We print those as ties and concessions, then look at what each identity buys on the last mile.
| Capability | La Growth Machine | |
|---|---|---|
| Multichannel sequences (LinkedIn, email, X, calls)Fair fight | LinkedIn today; email, WhatsApp and Instagram on the roadmap | LinkedIn + email on every plan, call steps from Pro, X on Ultimate |
| Voice messages on LinkedInFair fight | Recorded, or your cloned voice | AI voice messages on every plan, their flagship |
| Email sending with inbox rotationFair fight | On the roadmap, keep LGM for this | 1 to 10 sending mailboxes per identity by plan |
| Built-in B2B databaseFair fight | 300M+ included, emails verified at search time, no monthly cap | LGM Database for ICP search; enrichment metered at 250 to 1,000 leads/mo by plan |
| Intent signals and lookalike audiencesFair fight | AI reads every reply; engagement steps in sequences | Signals (beta) + Lookalike Search, a real intent engine |
| Native CRM integrationsFair fight | HubSpot, plus webhooks and REST API | HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, on the top tier |
| AI-agent access (MCP)Fair fight | REST API and webhooks | MCP server for Claude agents, genuinely modern |
| Real video file uploaded natively in the LinkedIn DM | Generated per lead from your clone, plays in the thread | A link from Sendspark, Hyperise or Weezly to an external page |
| AI face and voice cloning, 25 languages | One 2-minute recording, ever | AI voice intro merged with your recording; face cloning not advertised |
| AI comments on LinkedIn posts | Written by AI about the lead's actual post | Post likes are automated; AI comments not advertised |
| SSI-based safe sending limits | Read per account, applied in one click | Proxies absorbed + behaviour limits; SSI-based limits not advertised |
| Deal pipeline on replies | Kanban from Interested to Won, built in | Multichannel inbox; the pipeline lives in your CRM via top-tier sync |
| Booking pages included | Under every video, Google and Outlook calendars | Calendly integration for booking from sequences |
| Mobile app with AI reply alerts (iOS + Android) | Not advertised | |
| Price for one converting LinkedIn seat | $59/mo per sender, everything above included | €60 to €180 per identity per month, enriched leads metered (their published pricing, July 2026) |
LGM capabilities and prices from their published site, pricing and changelog, July 2026 (their pricing rendered inconsistently on our fetch, so verify on the live page). "Not advertised" means exactly that: we could not find it on their public pages. And yes, the two products list each other as integrations; this table is about choosing your last mile, not about burning a bridge.
Weezly vs La Growth Machine, answered
Keep LGM for the layer. Add Weezly for the last mile.
La Growth Machine runs a genuinely strong multichannel engine, and the partnership is mutual: they list Weezly on their own integrations page. Weezly runs the mile their layer leaves to links: your AI clone's video as a real file in the LinkedIn DM, replies read by AI, a pipeline, booking pages and a mobile app, one $59 subscription. Setting it up takes an afternoon.